Assessment
Task
Due
date: Following
session 3. (Date to be advised.)
Consent
form/s must be completed prior to collection of data.
Click
here to print off/save a Parent Consent Form
You
need to print this form onto a school letterhead.
Action
Research Report Guidelines
Click
here to print/save a blank copy of the report outline
Abstract
(200 –300 words)
This
is a brief overview of the project report. It should include the
• hypothesis,
• brief
outline of the method you used
• summary
of the findings
• their
implications. |
Write
this last |
Introduction
This section indicates
• the
underlying problem you are examining.
•
current relevant literature that supports your study
• links
between the literature and the problem you are examining
• the
hypothesis you are investigating
|
The
broad topic / problem you are targeting Many students at the
middle - late primary level have difficulty learning to read automatically
words or two or more syllables (Berninger & Abbott, 1994).
Why this is a problem
Related
research that has been done - literature search. Students
are assisted to automatise their reading of 1-syllable words by
drawing on various types of knowledge (phonemic segmentation,
blending, analogy, orthographic knowledge of syllables. .....
Unlike 1-syllable words, the phonological demands for learning
to read poly syllabic words have attracted little attention.
Link
related research in literature with the problem you are researching.
What might be causing the problems you are investigating ? Accurate
reading of poly syllabic words requires additional knowledge and
abilities . An area of required phonemic knowledge is the unstressed
vowel or the schwa..... Their phonological codes are complicated
by features such as syllabic boundaries and the differential accentuation
of syllables. Procedures for linking letter clusters and matching
sounds in these words include hierarchical phonological blending
and the retention of two or more multi phonemic units. Access
to the range of links between matching codes is predicted to account
for reading disability.
The
present investigation aims to extend the earlier research by examining
the influence of polysyllabic phonological knowledge on (1) learning
to read words of more than one syllable and (2) reading comprehension.
Prediction
: Teaching middle years students who have reading difficulties
to de-stress vowels in syllables in poly syllabic words leads
to an improvement in polysyllabic word reading ability. |
Method
This section should provide enough information to allow the
reader to re-do or replicate your study. You should provide information
about :
• the
participants :
• who
was involved in the project,
• how
they were selected /identified,
• relevant
characteristics (their age, entry abilities in reading, etc).
• the
materials you used , the formal / informal assessment measures
you used for data collection
• the
procedure you followed, for example,
• what
you did (the nature of the activities / intervention),
• where
the project occurred,
• how
often sessions were conducted
• how
you use the data you collected. |
Design
: the study uses a case study OXO design. in which the gain
in polysyllabic word reading accuracy and prose comprehension
following phonemic teaching for poly syllabic words is monitored
for middle year students who have reading difficulties.
Participants
: The participants are 7 fifth grade students who have a history
of reading difficulties. All participants attend a school .....Their
age, entry reading ability, ..... are shown in Table 1.
Materials
: Materials used include the following
• Phonological
teaching tasks : five phonological tasks were used: recognition
of the sound/s shared by two words of the same syllabic length,
phonemic and syllabic segmentation, substitution and blending.
• Word
reading tasks Children read individually presented words on the
...... These words vary on three dimensions of complexity ; .........
• Reading
comprehension tasks: Reading aloud was assessed using the
Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (Neale, 1998) and reading silently
using ..............
Procedure
The tasks were administered to all students in the following
order; phonological - phonemic tasks......... The teaching sessions
were conducted .........at a frequency of ....... Each session
lasted.......
Describe
the procedure briefly here. In an Appendix describe it in much
more depth so that any teacher could do exactly what you did.
Describe it as a teaching unit in the Appendix (you may want to
put up to 1000 words into Appendix). |
Results
This
section should contain an analysis of the data you obtained.
|
Observations
of the group Trends for the group indicated that all
students ....... Differences between the learning progress for
students ........ How the group trends support / don't support
your prediction.
The
learning trend for each student How the trends for each
student does / doesn't support your prediction. Student A
.......You may want to show each student's progress in a graph.
|
Discussion
In
this section
• interpret
the data you have collected in relation to your hypothesis. This
may include possible reasons for why unexpected results were obtained.
• discuss
implications for teaching practice.
• directions
for future research.
|
Summary
of the extent of support for your prediction. Note whether
your hypothesis was supported better by particular conditions,
for example, by some children, by some tasks, on some occasions,
etc. Suggest possible reasons for this. Discuss any unexpected
or surprising outcomes.
Discuss
how your findings match or fit with those of other investigators
you have mentioned in the literature review. Note any ways
in which your findings extend or question what was already known.
Discuss
any implications for teaching practice suggested by your study.
Discuss
possible directions for future research that are suggested by
your results. |
References
/ Bibliography
Style
Guide Format recommended. |
To
mention the source of particular ideas you are referring to in
the body of your report, mention the author/s and date when the
written material was published, for example, (Mossenson, Hill
& Masters, 1987) or (Neale, 1998).
In
the References / Bibliography section, give the full title of
the publication, for example
• for
a book : Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read : thinking and
learning about print. Cambridge, Mass : MIT Press.
• for
an article : Ehri, L.C. & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need
some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research
Quarterly, 27, 1, 13-25.
• for
an test : Neale, M.D. (1988). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability
: Revised. Melbourne : ACER.
|
Appendix
Descibe
your teaching unit in an appendix.
Describe
the type of outcome;
• What
reading behaviour will it change, the things students will be
able to do / know having gone through it (primary reading areas,
secondary reading areas) ?
• Into
which cell/s in the model does it fit ? |
Examples
• improve
phonological /phonemic knowledge for poly syllabic words
• improve
letter cluster knowledge for poly syllabic words
• improve
use of paraphrasing strategies while reading to enhance sentence
level comprehension
• improve
use of pre -reading comprehension strategies, for example, helping
students
• improve
self efficacy in the early phases of reading
• improve
retrieval of knowledge from long term memory when beginning to
read
• teach
students to convert imagery knowledge to verbal knowledge prior
to reading
|
Describe
the activity
• what
teacher will do in steps, the instructional language used to teach
it, the materials to be used
• what
children will do
• what
does it assume students already know / can do ?
• how
will key behaviours taught be stored in memory / transferred ?
|
|
Specify
the format
• the
grade level
• format
- small group, individual, large group |
|
|