Subject Banner Subject Home The Faculty of Education

Assessment Task

Due date: Following session 3. (Date to be advised.)
Consent form/s must be completed prior to collection of data.

Click here to print off/save a Parent Consent Form
You need to print this form onto a school letterhead.


Action Research Report Guidelines

Click here to print/save a blank copy of the report outline

Abstract (200 –300 words)

This is a brief overview of the project report. It should include the

• hypothesis,

• brief outline of the method you used

• summary of the findings

• their implications.

Write this last

Introduction This section indicates

• the underlying problem you are examining.

• current relevant literature that supports your study

• links between the literature and the problem you are examining

• the hypothesis you are investigating

 

The broad topic / problem you are targeting Many students at the middle - late primary level have difficulty learning to read automatically words or two or more syllables (Berninger & Abbott, 1994). Why this is a problem

Related research that has been done - literature search. Students are assisted to automatise their reading of 1-syllable words by drawing on various types of knowledge (phonemic segmentation, blending, analogy, orthographic knowledge of syllables. ..... Unlike 1-syllable words, the phonological demands for learning to read poly syllabic words have attracted little attention.

Link related research in literature with the problem you are researching. What might be causing the problems you are investigating ? Accurate reading of poly syllabic words requires additional knowledge and abilities . An area of required phonemic knowledge is the unstressed vowel or the schwa..... Their phonological codes are complicated by features such as syllabic boundaries and the differential accentuation of syllables. Procedures for linking letter clusters and matching sounds in these words include hierarchical phonological blending and the retention of two or more multi phonemic units. Access to the range of links between matching codes is predicted to account for reading disability.

The present investigation aims to extend the earlier research by examining the influence of polysyllabic phonological knowledge on (1) learning to read words of more than one syllable and (2) reading comprehension.

Prediction : Teaching middle years students who have reading difficulties to de-stress vowels in syllables in poly syllabic words leads to an improvement in polysyllabic word reading ability.

Method This section should provide enough information to allow the reader to re-do or replicate your study. You should provide information about :

• the participants :

• who was involved in the project,

• how they were selected /identified,

• relevant characteristics (their age, entry abilities in reading, etc).

• the materials you used , the formal / informal assessment measures you used for data collection

• the procedure you followed, for example,

• what you did (the nature of the activities / intervention),

• where the project occurred,

• how often sessions were conducted

• how you use the data you collected.

Design : the study uses a case study OXO design. in which the gain in polysyllabic word reading accuracy and prose comprehension following phonemic teaching for poly syllabic words is monitored for middle year students who have reading difficulties.

Participants : The participants are 7 fifth grade students who have a history of reading difficulties. All participants attend a school .....Their age, entry reading ability, ..... are shown in Table 1.

Materials : Materials used include the following

• Phonological teaching tasks : five phonological tasks were used: recognition of the sound/s shared by two words of the same syllabic length, phonemic and syllabic segmentation, substitution and blending.

• Word reading tasks Children read individually presented words on the ...... These words vary on three dimensions of complexity ; .........

• Reading comprehension tasks: Reading aloud was assessed using the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (Neale, 1998) and reading silently using ..............

Procedure The tasks were administered to all students in the following order; phonological - phonemic tasks......... The teaching sessions were conducted .........at a frequency of ....... Each session lasted.......

Describe the procedure briefly here. In an Appendix describe it in much more depth so that any teacher could do exactly what you did. Describe it as a teaching unit in the Appendix (you may want to put up to 1000 words into Appendix).

Results

This section should contain an analysis of the data you obtained.

Observations of the group Trends for the group indicated that all students ....... Differences between the learning progress for students ........ How the group trends support / don't support your prediction.

The learning trend for each student How the trends for each student does / doesn't support your prediction. Student A .......You may want to show each student's progress in a graph.

Discussion

In this section

• interpret the data you have collected in relation to your hypothesis. This may include possible reasons for why unexpected results were obtained.

• discuss implications for teaching practice.

• directions for future research.

Summary of the extent of support for your prediction. Note whether your hypothesis was supported better by particular conditions, for example, by some children, by some tasks, on some occasions, etc. Suggest possible reasons for this. Discuss any unexpected or surprising outcomes.

Discuss how your findings match or fit with those of other investigators you have mentioned in the literature review. Note any ways in which your findings extend or question what was already known.

Discuss any implications for teaching practice suggested by your study.

Discuss possible directions for future research that are suggested by your results.

References / Bibliography

Style Guide Format recommended.

To mention the source of particular ideas you are referring to in the body of your report, mention the author/s and date when the written material was published, for example, (Mossenson, Hill & Masters, 1987) or (Neale, 1998).

In the References / Bibliography section, give the full title of the publication, for example

• for a book : Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read : thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, Mass : MIT Press.

• for an article : Ehri, L.C. & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 1, 13-25.

• for an test : Neale, M.D. (1988). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability : Revised. Melbourne : ACER.

 

Appendix

Descibe your teaching unit in an appendix.

Describe the type of outcome;

• What reading behaviour will it change, the things students will be able to do / know having gone through it (primary reading areas, secondary reading areas) ?

• Into which cell/s in the model does it fit ?

Examples

• improve phonological /phonemic knowledge for poly syllabic words

• improve letter cluster knowledge for poly syllabic words

• improve use of paraphrasing strategies while reading to enhance sentence level comprehension

• improve use of pre -reading comprehension strategies, for example, helping students

• improve self efficacy in the early phases of reading

• improve retrieval of knowledge from long term memory when beginning to read

• teach students to convert imagery knowledge to verbal knowledge prior to reading

Describe the activity

• what teacher will do in steps, the instructional language used to teach it, the materials to be used

• what children will do

• what does it assume students already know / can do ?

• how will key behaviours taught be stored in memory / transferred ?

 

Specify the format

• the grade level

• format - small group, individual, large group

 
 

Back to Subject Home